Gold pen on marble surface symbolizing contracts and Florida CHOICE Act non-compete restrictions

Florida CHOICE Act: Doubling Down on Non-Competes

The Florida CHOICE Act (Contracts Honoring Opportunity, Investment, Confidentiality, and Economic Growth Act), effective July 1, 2025, represents a major expansion of enforceable non-compete and garden-leave agreements in Florida. It creates a new category of “covered” agreements that enjoy a presumption of enforceability if certain formalities are met—such as being in writing, providing the employee at least seven days to review, advising them of the right to counsel, and obtaining their acknowledgment that they have received or will receive confidential information or customer relationships.

Key changes tilt the balance toward employers. The Act extends what is considered a “reasonable” restriction period from two years to up to four years—both for non-competes and for garden-leave agreements. This is significant because “garden leave” can require employees to remain formally employed (and typically compensated) but unable to work elsewhere, raising questions about how long such arrangements can be maintained in practice.

Perhaps most consequentially, the Act mandates courts to grant preliminary injunctions enforcing covered agreements unless the employee can prove by clear and convincing evidence that an exception applies. This shifts the burden of proof and accelerates judicial remedies, giving employers faster and stronger tools to block competitive moves.

Why it matters
  • For the marketplace: The law could reduce talent mobility in Florida and increase litigation risk, especially in competitive industries.
  • For employers: Longer restriction periods and a presumption of enforceability provide powerful leverage to protect trade secrets, customer relationships, and investments, with faster court intervention when needed.
  • For employees: High-earning workers may face multi-year limits on job mobility; the burden of fighting enforcement now rests on them, not the employer.

Similar Posts